This fixes#326. It adds a new `pin_method` configuration option to the
`ipfshttp` component allows to configure it to perform `refs -r <cid>` before
the `pin/add` call. By fetching content before pinning, we don't have
a global lock in place, and we can have several pin-requests to
ipfs in parallel.
It also adds a `concurrent_pins` option to the pin tracker, which
launches more pin workers so it can potentially trigger more pins at
the same time. This is a minimal intervention in the pintracker as #308
is still pending.
Documentation for the configuration file has been updated.
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <code@hector.link>
This enables support for testing in jenkins.
Several minor adjustments have been performed to improve the probability
that the tests pass, but there are still some random
problems appearing with libp2p conections not becoming available or
stopping working (similar to travis, but perhaps more often).
MacOS and Windows builds are broken in worse ways (those issues will
need to be addressed in the future).
Thanks to @zenground0 and @victorbjelkholm for support!
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <code@hector.link>
This also generates a default configuration section when it
doesn't exist, so it's backwards compatible.
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <code@hector.link>
The main differences is that the new version of Raft is more strict
about starting raft peers which already contain configurations.
For a start, cluster will fail to start if the configured cluster
peers are different from the Raft peers. The user will have to
manually cleanup Raft (TODO: an ipfs-cluster-service command for it).
Additionally, this commit adds extra options to the consensus/raft
configuration section, adds tests and improves existing ones and
improves certain code sections.
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <hector@protocol.ai>
The following commit reimplements ipfs-cluster configuration under
the following premises:
* Each component is initialized with a configuration object
defined by its module
* Each component decides how the JSON representation of its
configuration looks like
* Each component parses and validates its own configuration
* Each component exposes its own defaults
* Component configurations are make the sections of a
central JSON configuration file (which replaces the current
JSON format)
* Component configurations implement a common interface
(config.ComponentConfig) with a set of common operations
* The central configuration file is managed by a
config.ConfigManager which:
* Registers ComponentConfigs
* Assigns the correspondent sections from the JSON file to each
component and delegates the parsing
* Delegates the JSON generation for each section
* Can be notified when the configuration is updated and must be
saved to disk
The new service.json would then look as follows:
```json
{
"cluster": {
"id": "QmTVW8NoRxC5wBhV7WtAYtRn7itipEESfozWN5KmXUQnk2",
"private_key": "<...>",
"secret": "00224102ae6aaf94f2606abf69a0e278251ecc1d64815b617ff19d6d2841f786",
"peers": [],
"bootstrap": [],
"leave_on_shutdown": false,
"listen_multiaddress": "/ip4/0.0.0.0/tcp/9096",
"state_sync_interval": "1m0s",
"ipfs_sync_interval": "2m10s",
"replication_factor": -1,
"monitor_ping_interval": "15s"
},
"consensus": {
"raft": {
"heartbeat_timeout": "1s",
"election_timeout": "1s",
"commit_timeout": "50ms",
"max_append_entries": 64,
"trailing_logs": 10240,
"snapshot_interval": "2m0s",
"snapshot_threshold": 8192,
"leader_lease_timeout": "500ms"
}
},
"api": {
"restapi": {
"listen_multiaddress": "/ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/9094",
"read_timeout": "30s",
"read_header_timeout": "5s",
"write_timeout": "1m0s",
"idle_timeout": "2m0s"
}
},
"ipfs_connector": {
"ipfshttp": {
"proxy_listen_multiaddress": "/ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/9095",
"node_multiaddress": "/ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/5001",
"connect_swarms_delay": "7s",
"proxy_read_timeout": "10m0s",
"proxy_read_header_timeout": "5s",
"proxy_write_timeout": "10m0s",
"proxy_idle_timeout": "1m0s"
}
},
"monitor": {
"monbasic": {
"check_interval": "15s"
}
},
"informer": {
"disk": {
"metric_ttl": "30s",
"metric_type": "freespace"
},
"numpin": {
"metric_ttl": "10s"
}
}
}
```
This new format aims to be easily extensible per component. As such,
it already surfaces quite a few new options which were hardcoded
before.
Additionally, since Go API have changed, some redundant methods have been
removed and small refactoring has happened to take advantage of the new
way.
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <hector@protocol.ai>
The disk informer uses "ipfs repo stat" to fetch the RepoSize value and
uses it as a metric.
The numpinalloc allocator is now a generalized ascendalloc which
sorts metrics in ascending order and return the ones with lowest
values.
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <hector@protocol.ai>
An initial, simple approach to this. The PeerMonitor will
check it's metrics, compare to the current set of peers and put
an alert in the alerts channel if the metrics for a peer have expired.
Cluster reads this channel looking for "ping" alerts. The leader
is in charge of triggering repins in all the Cids allocated to
a given peer.
Also, metrics are now broadcasted to the cluster instead of pushed only
to the leader. Since they happen every few seconds it should be okay
regarding how it scales. Main problem was that if the leader is the node
going down, the new leader will not now about it as it doesn't have any
metrics for it, so it won't trigger an alert. If it acted on that then
the component needs to know it is the leader, or cluster needs to
handle alerts in complicated ways when leadership changes. Detecting
leadership changes or letting a component know who is the leader is another
dependency from the consensus algorithm that should be avoided. Therefore
we broadcast, for the moment.
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <hector@protocol.ai>
This is the third implementation attempt. This time, rather than
broadcasting PeerAdd/Join requests to the whole cluster, we use the
consensus log to broadcast new peers joining.
This makes it easier to recover from errors and to know who exactly
is member of a cluster and who is not. The consensus is, after all,
meant to agree on things, and the list of cluster peers is something
everyone has to agree on.
Raft itself uses a special log operation to maintain the peer set.
The tests are almost unchanged from the previous attempts so it should
be the same, except it doesn't seem possible to bootstrap a bunch of nodes
at the same time using different bootstrap nodes. It works when using
the same. I'm not sure this worked before either, but the code is
simpler than recursively contacting peers, and scales better for
larger clusters.
Nodes have to be careful about joining clusters while keeping the state
from a different cluster (disjoint logs). This may cause problems with
Raft.
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <hector@protocol.ai>
This commit adds PeerAdd() and PeerRemove() endpoints, CLI support,
tests. Peer management is a delicate issue because of how the consensus
works underneath and the places that need to track such peers.
When adding a peer the procedure is as follows:
* Try to open a connection to the new peer and abort if not reachable
* Broadcast a PeerManagerAddPeer operation which tells all cluster members
to add the new Peer. The Raft leader will add it to Raft's peerset and
the multiaddress will be saved in the ClusterPeers configuration key.
* If the above fails because some cluster node is not responding,
broadcast a PeerRemove() and try to undo any damage.
* If the broadcast succeeds, send our ClusterPeers to the new Peer along with
the local multiaddress we are using in the connection opened in the
first step (that is the multiaddress through which the other peer can reach us)
* The new peer updates its configuration with the new list and joins
the consensus
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <hector@protocol.ai>
