Align with previous behaviour and make sure it is logged that
the configuration file was written.
Do not say "peerstore written with 0 entries" as that might be
taken like an error.
Fixes#865.
This makes the necessary changes so that consensu is selected on "init" with a
flag set, by default, to "crdt". This generates only a "crdt" or a "raft"
section, not both.
If the configuration file has a "raft" section, "raft" will be used to start
the daemon. If it has a "crdt" section, "crdt" will be used. If it has none or
both sections, an error will happen.
This also affects "state *" commands, which will now autoselect how to work
from the existing configuration.
This introduces a pin/update operation which allows to Pin a new item to
cluster indicating that said pin is an update to an already-existing pin.
When this is the case, all the configuration for the existing pin is copied to
the new one (including allocations). The IPFS connector will then trigger
pin/update directly in IPFS, allowing an efficient pinning based on
DAG-differences. Since the allocations where the same for both pins,
the pin/update can proceed.
PinUpdate does not unpin the previous pin (it is not possible to do this
atomically in cluster like it happens in IPFS). The user can manually do it
after the pin/update is done.
Internally, after a lot of deliberations on what the optimal way for this is,
I opted for adding a `PinUpdate` option to the `PinOptions` type (carries the
CID to update from). In order to carry this option from the REST API to the
IPFS Connector, it is serialized in the Protobuf (and stored in the
datastore). There is no other way to do this in a simple fashion since the Pin
object is piece of information that is sent around.
Additionally, making it a PinOption plays well with the Pin/PinPath APIs which
need little changes. Effectively, you are pinning a new thing. You are just
indicating that it should be configured from an existing one.
Fixes#732
* Daemon: support remote configuration
This:
* Adds support for fetching the configuration from a remote HTTP location:
`ipfs-cluster-service init http://localhost:8080/ipfs/Qm...` will instruct
cluster to read the configuration file from ipfs on start (potentially making
use of ipns and dnslink).
This is done by creating a `service.json` like `{ "source": <url> }`.
The source is then read when loading that configuration every time the daemon starts.
This allows to let users always use a mutating remote configuration, potentially
adding/removing trusted peers from the list or adjusting other things.
* Configuration and state helpers from ipfs-cluster-service have been extracted
to its own cmdutils package. This will help supporting something like an
`ipfs-cluster-follow` command in the next releases.
* Allows to disable the rest api by not defining it in the configuration (I thought
this was already so, but apparently only affected the ipfsproxy).
* Removes informer/allocator configurations from the daemon (--alloc). No one used
a non default pair. In fact, it was potentially buggy to use the reposize one.
Peers configured with follower_mode = true fail to add/pin/unpin.
Additionally they do not contact other peers when doing Status, Sync or
Recover and report on themselves.
They still contact other peers when doing "peers ls", as this is an OpenRPC
endpoint.
This is merely improving user interaction with a cluster peer and avoids
getting into confusing places:
* pin/unpin seems to work even no one trusts them
* status will query all peers in the peerset only to get auth errors and
ignore them, becoming way slower than it could be
This is not a security feature.
As raised in #793, sometimes the user wants to simply disallow unpinning
altogether in a Cluster peer so that no content can be removed from IPFS
through cluster, even when crendentials are compromised (including access to
RPC endpoint).
This introduces an unpin_disable parameter for the ipfshttp connector. There
is no way that a cluster will effecitvely unpin something if the connector
refuses to ask ipfs.
With this commit
- If cid in `DELETE /pins/{cid}` isn't part of the pinset, it would
return 404
- If path in `DELETE /pins/{keyType}/{path}` resolves to a cid that
isn't part of the pinset, it would return 404
It has a few implications to launch a raft peer when you wanted to do crdt and vice-versa.
Same when exporting and exporting states.
Users starting cluster peers should be explicit about their consensus choice.
Also, if we ever want to make `crdt` the default, we can't do that before
making `raft` non-default first. I don't like to break things but otherwise
the experience for new users wanting to try crdts might be aweful.
With this commit, cluster peer will observe on events of peer removal
from cluster. On occurence of the event, the cluster peer will clear
the removed peer from its peerstore.
* Init should take a list of peers
This commit adds `--peers` option to `ipfs-cluster-service init`
`ipfs-cluster-service init --peers <multiaddress,multiaddress>`
- Adds and writes the given peers to the peerstore file
- For raft config section, adds the peer IDs to the `init_peerset`
- For crdt config section, add the peer IDs to the `trusted_peers`
* Improve pin/unpin method signatures:
These changes the following Cluster Go API methods:
* -> Cluster.Pin(ctx, cid, options) (pin, error)
* -> Cluster.Unpin(ctx, cid) (pin, error)
* -> Cluster.PinPath(ctx, path, opts) (pin,error)
Pin and Unpin now return the pinned object.
The signature of the methods now matches that of the API Client, is clearer as
to what options the user can set and is aligned with PinPath, UnpinPath, which
returned pin methods.
The REST API now returns the Pinned/Unpinned object rather than 204-Accepted.
This was necessary for a cleaner pin/update approach, which I'm working on in
another branch.
Most of the changes here are updating tests to the new signatures
* Adapt load-balancing client to new Pin/Unpin signatures
* cluster.go: Fix typo
Co-Authored-By: Kishan Sagathiya <kishansagathiya@gmail.com>
* cluster.go: Fix typo
Co-Authored-By: Kishan Sagathiya <kishansagathiya@gmail.com>
This adds a LoadBalancing rest client implementation which is initialized with a set of client configurations and can use two strategies: failover and roundrobin (more strategies can be added by implementing the LBStrategy interface).
